The 'AIFMD Depository Models 2014' special report comprises six separate articles listed below, these can be read individually or as a sequence.

Story

Challenges and considerations of depository requirements under AIFMD

Challenges and considerations of depository requirements under AIFMD

By Gavin Byrnes, UBS Fund Services – The Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (“AIFMD”) has caused much rancour and debate over the last few years but at last the end is in sight. Some of the more challenging aspects of the Directive have centred on the Remuneration and Depository provisions, which the industry as a whole has struggled to understand and establish within their businesses.

Story

Determining the veracity of assets is a core requirement

Determining the veracity of assets is a core requirement

Both depositories and fund administrators face huge demands from a data management perspective under the AIFM Directive. For any depository appointed by an AIFM running an onshore hedge fund, the scope of responsibility is greater than that required under a depository lite scenario for AIFMs running non-EU funds. This is because of the strict liability placed on the depository to return assets to the AIF in the event that something unforeseen happens and assets are lost.

Story

Integrated and menu-driven model to support AIFMs of all sizes

Integrated and menu-driven model to support AIFMs of all sizes

For the most part a lot of the drama surrounding the role of depositories and prime brokers under AIFMD has subsided. All parties concerned have pretty much fallen into line and are clear with what everyone’s roles and responsibilities will be. This is certainly true of Deutsche Bank who are fully AIFMD-compliant and already actively engaged in signing depository agreements with clients.