Market liberalisation will drive growth for China's mutual funds, says Fitch Ratings

The size and growth of the mutual fund sector in China, combined with recent market liberalisation steps, will lead to more investment managers applying for onshore fund-management licenses, according to Fitch Ratings.

China is now the fifth-largest mutual fund market worldwide, and one of the fastest-growing. Its open-end mutual fund assets were CNY15 trillion (USD2.2 trillion) as of end-June 2020, although it remains far behind the US's USD22 trillion in mutual fund assets.

Over the three years to end-1Q20, China's mutual fund assets grew by almost 70 per cent, while global mutual fund assets increasing by just 12 per cent, according to ICI Global data.

China's mutual fund industry growth during the coronavirus pandemic is also notable, as assets grew by 11 per cent in 1Q20 - global mutual fund assets decreased by 13 per cent in the same period.

Money market funds (MMFs) have been a major part of China's mutual fund growth. The largest fund type in China, MMFs account for around half of Chinese mutual fund assets. China was the second-largest MMF market in the world at end June-2020, with assets under management of CNY7.6 trillion (USD1.2 trillion), compared with assets of USD4.4 trillion in the US. The US, however, has a much lower share of fund assets in MMFs, at around 20 per cent of the total.

MMFs tend to be less affected by market movements in periods of market stress than, for example, equity funds, and can even have inflows in such periods as a result of heightened risk aversion. As a result, the high allocation of funds to MMFs in China, compared with other markets, supported the high overall retention of fund assets in China in the first quarter of 2020.

The largest MMF in China, Yu'e Bao, has grown very rapidly, driving growth of the overall sector. Yu'e Bao had assets under management of CNY1.2 trillion (USD173 billion) at end-June 2020, making it one of the 10 largest MMFs worldwide - the other nine are US funds investing in government debt. Yu'e Bao's growth has been driven by its distribution channel – it functions almost like a cash utility, through the Alipay online payment platform.

The strong electronic distribution channel in China is different to other markets, where direct or intermediated distribution tends to dominate fund distribution. Recently regulatory intervention has resulted in a dispersion of Yu'e Bao's assets to other MMFs on the Yu'e Bao platform, resulting in the fund losing its place as the world's largest MMF - a position occupied by a Goldman Sachs US government fund as of June 2020.

Institutional investors and retail investors have driven Chinese mutual fund growth in almost equal shares in recent years. Institutional investors account for the majority of assets in bond funds, while retail investors tend to be more yield-driven and account for the majority of equity and balanced fund assets. Despite the yield focus, two thirds of MMF investors were retail investors as of end-2019. The recent market strength in the Chinese 'A' share market - renminbi-denominated shares trading on the Shanghai or Shenzen stock exchanges - could be a risk to MMFs, potentially leading to outflows as yield-hungry retail investors withdraw money from MMFs to invest in equities.

Overall, Fitch expects the combination of increasing household wealth and an ageing population to drive sustained longer-term growth in Chinese mutual fund assets. The penetration rate of mutual fund holdings as a share of savings is fairly low in China. This presents both a challenge and an opportunity to investment managers: the challenge being getting retail investors to accept third-person investment management, and the opportunity being the potential for material asset growth.

International investment managers' ability to access the Chinese domestic market has been limited. In terms of asset raising, these managers could enter only into joint ventures with domestic entities. However, the 51 per cent cap on foreign ownership of investment firms was removed in April 2020. Since then, three international investment managers have applied for onshore licenses, while a fourth was in the process of buying out its joint venture partner.

While no full licenses have yet been granted, the application case of one investment manager, BlackRock, was accepted on 31 July 2020, bringing BlackRock a step closer to being granted a full license. Among China's 128 mutual-fund houses, 44 were joint ventures as of end-1Q20, and these accounted for 54 per cent of total mutual-fund assets.

Fitch believes this development is highly significant for the presence of international investment managers in China, and that other international investment managers will probably file license applications to enable them to have further access to the Chinese mutual fund market.

Author Profile