Thu, 12/06/2014 - 16:02
The Pensions Administration Standards Association (PASA) has warned the UK Government to be mindful of creating an unintentional pensions liberation trap by over-stretching administration resources.
Peter Dyer, chair of PASA’s Policy & Strategy sub-committee, says: “Generally speaking we welcome the simplification proposed by the government in the area of defined contribution (DC) pensions and the ability of members to make choices at retirement which suit their needs and expectations.
“However, we are concerned about the impact of the changes where they conflict with scheme rules, as well as the potential peak demand on administrators which may emerge from the changes at both interim and final legislative level - and the timeline which itself is extremely tight - and could produce a run in demand for transfer quotations and settlement during a compressed period. We are anxious that this does not drive less scrupulous pensions liberation operatives from stepping in to take advantage of any hiatus caused by the introduction of new regulations.”
PASA’s response to the consultation highlighted the importance of ensuring any changes proposed and implemented support the principles of improving standards in pension administration, which in turn enable members to make informed decisions about their future retirement income. In its response, PASA also highlighted concerns that:
· Limiting changes to DC schemes only would further extend the current two-tier environment and introduce additional, unnecessary complexity in the administration of schemes; and
· The indicative timeline, for changes to be implemented for retirements from April 2015, will leave insufficient time for administrators to execute the change to systems, procedures and issue revised member documentation, including the new Guidance, four months in advance of April in order to meet the disclosure requirement, i.e. by the end of November 2014.
Dyer says: “From an administrative perspective we think the biggest concern is that any announcement in connection with the closure of the window for DB transfers will prompt a run on requests for transfers, increasing demand on resources which will be stretched implementing the statutory changes. Administrators may well struggle to satisfy this demand, or to meet disclosure requirements before the window closes, causing members to potentially miss out on a transfer and this may even lead to claims for compensation. A run on the administrator’s ability to effect a measured response to member requests could possibly contribute to an increase in pension liberation activity, clearly an unsatisfactory outcome in light of current efforts to minimise this practice.”
Thu 08/09/2016 - 10:16
Tue 09/08/2016 - 10:23
Fri 15/07/2016 - 13:46
Wed 16/07/2014 - 12:23
Wed 30/11/2016 - 13:36
Mon 03/10/2016 - 10:33
Mon, 27/Feb/2017 - 14:21
Mon, 27/Feb/2017 - 13:00
Mon, 27/Feb/2017 - 12:56
Mon, 27/Feb/2017 - 11:09
Mon, 27/Feb/2017 - 11:09
Mon, 27/Feb/2017 - 10:41